Blond Bigotry, Anti-Semitism & Why a Candidate’s Wife Fabricated Her Family

Florence Harding in Florida.

Florence Harding in Florida.

This article is part of an ongoing series about the racial, religious and ethnic identity of First Ladies, beginning with the recent discoveries about First Lady Michelle Obama and her ancestry from both an Irish immigrant family of Georgia slave-owners and African slaves emerging from Rachel Swarns new book on the subject, American Tapestry. That story can be read at:

In two previous articles, it has considered the family histories of Jacqueline Kennedy ( and Eleanor Roosevelt

Forthcoming are articles on Pat Nixon, Edith Wilson and Mamie Eisenhower and the series will conclude with a look a the Atheist and Welsh immigrant father of Ann Davis Romney, wife of the Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. 

The series is not a definitive guide to genealogy, nor from the perspective of the professional genealogists but rather to illustrate the uniquely American issues of “identity,” the choices made by individuals with various ethnic origins who, by personal choice for various reasons, associate themselves with one part of their background over others. More importantly, the series focuses on how such choices of identity by spouses have served the political and campaign purposes of Presidential candidates and Presidents.

Florence Harding.

It may seem hard to imagine now, after a half-century of aspirational advertising and marketing casting those with blond hair in an “All-American” image, but that one physical characteristic was once viewed as the likely mark of being anti-American. 

And the atmosphere about this particular type of anti-American remained so intolerant that the wife of a presidential candidate in 1920, Florence Kling DeWolfe Harding, felt compelled to lie, twist, mislead and fabricate nearly all of facts of her family origin.

A series of anti-German posters.

Beginning in April of 1917, when the U.S. joined England, France, Italy, Belgium, Russia, Romania, Japan in war against Germany and Austria-Hungary, a rabid hatred of anyone in America even slightly suspected of any Teutonic ties often led to them being victimized by acts of hatred and violence or having their businesses boycotted.

German atrocity towards Belgian children was a centerpiece of anti-German sentiment in the U.S.

Not unlike the way that some members of the Sikh faith in Michigan were killed last week out of an ignorant presumption they were somehow connected to Islamist terrorists, so too were those with yellow-blond hair assumed to be German during World War I and threatened or harassed – even though they may have come from other nations. And many German immigrants who refused to swear allegiance to the U.S. war were thrown in prison for sedition. In New York, some newspapers even printed the names of residents reported by neighbors to be likely “Enemy Aliens.”

In New Mexico, an hysterical mob seized a German immigrant miner, forced him to his knees and kiss the U.S. flag. In Illinois, a coal miner was lynched.

German foods were banned or the names of the products Anglicized.

Dachshund dogs were killed simply because the breed originated in Germany.

Berlin, Michigan became Marne. Michigan. Chicago and New Orleans changed the names of its streets that were German in origin. German measles became “liberty measles,” and famously, sauerkraut was called “liberty cabbage.”

Dachshunds were called “liberty pups” if the dogs were lucky – many were stomped to death simply because the breed had come from Germany.

German mothers were said to push their sons to suicide for the Motherland, not unlike what was claimed about even non-Jihadist Muslim mothers telling their sons to do in the early 21st century.

German-language newspapers were forced to close. Fourteen states banned the teaching of Germanic languages in public schools.  Public libraries stacked German-language and German-subject books for burnings. In 1918, a bill was introduced in Congress intended to rid every German name in every one of the 48 states.

Worse than having blond hair, however, was having a distinctly German surname, regardless of how many generations it had been since one’s family had left that land for America. It meant social stigmatization, public derision or being suspected of disloyalty; many quickly Anglicized their surnames.

German nurses were depicted as no less cruel than their male counterparts.

Among the stories which further fueled the intolerance for German-Americans were those which suggested that cruel, brutal barbarism was simply in their blood. It was illustrated by tales of them cutting off the hands of Belgian children and the breasts of Belgian women. Propaganda posters even illustrated such acts of the monstrous barely-human “Huns,” as Germans were classified. The derogatory term “Kraut” also came into widespread use.

Even after World War I, suspicions about German-Americans persisted.

The Armistice ended the war, but suspicion and mistrust towards German-Americans, and the fearful self-consciousness of even those several generations away from Germany remained virulent. As government propaganda director Vernon Kellogg correctly predicted, “Will it be any wonder if, after the war, the people of the world, when they recognize any human being as a German, will shrink aside so that they may not touch him as he passes?”

At that time, over 8 million people in the U.S. were identified as German-Americans. Among them was the wife of the Republican Presidential candidate, nominated nineteen months after the war ended.

With her maiden name of Kling, Florence Harding was of German parentage through her father. Her first married name of DeWolfe  (though there is no marriage certificate and it was likely a common-law marriage when she was a teenager) was French in origin but sounded German.  And she was worried about the matter.

Warren Harding.

Minute details of race and religion were issues of importance to many Americans at the time.

In the town of Marion, Ohio, where she had been born, lived and matured, and where her husband, U.S. Senator Warren G. Harding was now conducting his presidential campaign, it was widely known that their marriage had been opposed by her father because of unproven but persistent legends that Harding had African-American ancestry.

Florence Harding and her father Amos Kling,

She was born Florence Mabel Kling in 1860, the daughter of Marion, Ohio’s wealthiest man, Amos Kling. He owned a thriving hardware store, vast farmlands in the outlaying region, and held interests in banking as well. But he was marked in town as being part of the subtle struggle of “English versus Germans,” the latter group being less educated and doing manual labor, having had to walk from Pennsylvania  into central Ohio whereas the more prosperous English took river transport. There were German newspapers and social clubs in town and when young Florence went with her father or on her own to collect rent from German-American farmers, she picked up some basic German and learned some of their superstitious customs from having lived in the woods.

Florence Harding with her horse Billy in front of the Kling home in Marion, Ohio.

When one assiduous Kling family genealogist tried to trace the later-First Lady’s paternal line, all she could definitively say was that they originated in Wurttemburg, but that “it is impossible for us to state the Christian name of the ancestor of Amos Kling.” 

The best estimate was that Florence Harding’s great-grandparents had originally immigrated to either Pennsylvania or New York.

Florence and Warren Harding.

With Harding conducting his campaign from the front-porch and property of their home, the national press corps descended on Marion to cover the daily events and speeches. Each day various local residents were interviewed for the “real story” on Warren and Florence Harding.

Florence Harding knitting on the front porch.

To combat revelation or gossip about her German heritage, Mrs. Harding played loose with the regional vernacular expression “Pennsylvania Dutch.”  Most of the rest of the nation assumed the term indicated ancestry from the Netherlands, rather than from Germany, as was the truth. Florence began talking about her fabricated Dutch heritage.

She so widely disseminated this fib that Warren Harding soon received a letter from the Society of Daughters of Holland Dames Descendants of the Families of New Netherlands. The heraldic organization declared to him that, “We are also glad that Mrs. Harding is of the Holland Dutch blood.”

Harding addressing crowds around his front porch. (Marion Star)

In response to the Dutch descendant organization, Harding responded, “We both rejoice to boast a strain.” He then mentioned his own ancestors’ specific family names that were Dutch – without providing any of his wife’s alleged “Holland Dutch” ancestral surnames. A copy of his  letter was even forwarded to the Queen Wilhelmina of Holland.

Conscious of how the anti-German sentiment could work politically against her husband’s election because of her heritage, Florence Harding sought to further distance herself from her ancestry by touting her father’s mother as being a “French grandmother,” attributing her own fussy tastes to her “French blood.”

Harding on his front porch speaking to crowds during the campaign.

France, of course, had been a U.S. ally during World War I, and she sought to further obscure the truth by suggesting the grandmother was Alsatian, a region where the border with Germany was known to shift. When she offhandedly elaborated that this grandmother had come from “southern France,” however, a new concern was raised.

Vetallis Kling, the First Lady’s brother who married a Catholic.

In an era when the Ku Klux Klan was rising to become a powerful force in American politic and making its way into mainstream American culture, the target of their acts of violence against people and property had been expanded beyond African-Americans to now include Catholics and Jews.

America First!” A Harding campaign poster painted by famous illustrator Howard Chandler Christy

In fact, part of Harding’s campaign theme played to nativist – though not racist – elements, focusing on domestic issues to be resolved and a promise to limit U.S. intervention in foreign countries. As President, Harding would also not protest the strict limitations placed on immigrants from predominantly Catholic and Jewish countries. This theme of “America First,” could easily be twisted by Democrats seeking to undermine the Harding campaign by seeking to exploit questions about his wife’s ancestry.

This gave Florence Harding further reason to worry: her youngest brother Vetallis Kling had married Nona Younkins, niece of the family’s Irish Catholic housekeeper and lived in Marion’s “Catholic section.”

Preventing any such trouble, her brother was discouraged from coming to the Harding home during the campaign and Mrs. Harding further clarified that the grandmother in question was “Hugenot,” a French Protestant. In truth, on her mother‘s side, Mrs. Harding was of English and Hugenot ancestry.

The Harding on their porch.

The greatest emphasis, however, was placed on the candidate’s own ancestry, which was invariably described as English, Scotch-Irish and Dutch, of “pioneer stock” and “Colonial stock,” as if Warren Harding were a horse or dog being bred for the presidency.  This was in reaction to Harding himself being made the subject of attacks from racist Democratic Party activist William Chancellor, a professor at Wooster College in Ohio.

Another shot of Harding speaking during the 1920 campaign from his front porch.

Chancellor had begun by handing out handbills at the Republican National Convention telling delegates that Harding had African-American ancestry. Once the campaign was headquartered in Harding’s home-town, he slinked around Marion and began interviewing anyone with a grudge towards Harding or his family, gathering everything from truth to gossip for a book.

Evalyn McLean and Florence Harding, in Florida 1922.

The book was a racist rant about Harding’s mixed-racial background and was printed in the first year of his presidency. It would eventually become the only book in American history to be specifically repressed by the government, the printing plates destroyed and every copy that could be found gathered up and brought to “Friendship,” the estate of Mrs. Harding’s confidante, the heiress and Hope Diamond owner Evalyn McLean. There they were destroyed.

The most important copy, however, which contained Chancellor’s further notes and information written in the margins and intended for a second, expanded edition – was pulled aside by Evalyn McLean. With her sense of history, this copy was preserved in her papers at the Library of Congress.

Detail of Mrs. Harding White House portrait by Philip de Lazlo..

It was in Chancellor’s first edition that it was first stated, “The Klings were Rhinelanders; some believe that they were originally Jewish.”  With her German ancestors coming from the Wurttemburg region where many towns in the 18th century did have a Jewish population, it was a possibility.  He printed this not out of any interest in genealogical integrity, however, but to raise further objections to the Hardings for those voters with anti-Semitic sentiments. Whether some ancient ancestor of her’s had been Jewish seemed moot. Florence Harding’s immediate ancestors had been German Lutheran and Methodist.

The Hardings reading congratulatory telegrams and election return reports on Election Night 1920.

Throughout the campaign that summer and fall, Florence Harding always made herself available to the press who worked from a bungalow on the back property. As the manager of her husband’s local newspaper The Marion Star, she was comfortable around reporters – and knew how to handle them. When one finally confronted her with questions about her ancestry, she snapped back, “I am one-hundred percent American. Always remember that.”

And, regardless of where her or anyone’s ancestors had immigrated from or what faith they had practiced – she was right.

Categories: Diversity, First Families, First Ladies, First Ladies & Ancestral Identity, Florence Harding, Politics, Presidents, The Hardings

Tags: , , , , , ,

16 replies »

  1. Not much has changed in dirty politics from then to now, has it?

    Interesting blog post, Carl.

    • Thanks so much Lisa. Yes – one could almost laugh if it didn’t make one cry. You see why I’m an Independent? Four years hit us, four years hit them, four years hit us, four years hit them….’ I wrote a story here some months back about how even being of the Quaker faith – the peaceful faith! – was used against Hoover and Nixon! Humans….mm, mm.

      • You are right…it is really disgusting. And I’m a NPA for the same reason. People assume that I am a staunch supporter of one particular party. They don’t understand that I have plenty to say about BOTH of the parties. Washington was right about not having a two party system. We really should have listened to him.

        As for Nixon, he is a perfect example of why I believe so strongly in limited government. Nixon may have been raised as a Quaker, but look at how his paranoia overcame his faith principles! There is something about power that seems to destroy the morality of even some of the best. That is why it is not good for ANY person to get too much power. They will leave all their principles behind in their quest to gain and keep more and more power.

        • And yet no viable Third Party has ever risen – the last with any real hope was the Progressive Bullmoose Party. It is a curious dilemma. And yet I also see someone, like Nixon, for example, as having also done some incredibly positive things and moved the country forward in ways so many can’t see. So, when one begins to really sift through the tedious record one sees that it is rare for any President to be truly all good or all bad – just like the rest of humanity.

          • Nixon is so tragic because he was doing so much good in so many ways and yet destroyed HIMSELF with his own quest to keep power, fueled by paranoia. He would have gone down as one of our best. Instead, he will always be remembered for Watergate.

            As for a 3rd Party, I don’t really see that as the answer either. It would be the same problem, except the fight would be a three way tug of war. I think the answer is more to get rid of parties altogether. Each man or woman should stand on his/her own record. A person shouldn’t have to put aside the best interests of the people who have put them in office because ANY party claims their loyalty. The primary loyalty should be to the voters. The nature of the party system makes that all but impossible.

          • I think you’ve got a great idea there – in theory. Yet like-minded fellows, always eager to coalesce power will naturally gravitate towards each other to consolidate power, even if never identifying themselves as being in allegiance. It has been true since the ancient times. In truth, it would be reliant on an uber-alert and active electorate. I won’t comment further on that aspect.

  2. You are probably right, Carl. Still, maybe it would be a fresh start that would at least dilute some of the power that the parties now hold.

    • The last step taken in that direction was in the 1828 election when voters (white and male only) were given the right to directly vote for a President. Before that, remember, it was members of Congress who chose the President as electors. In any event this thread of discussion wanders too far afield from the subject matter of the article.

  3. Great article! I also love reading the comments and replies!

  4. Dear Mr. Anthony,
    Are there any recordings of Mrs. Harding speaking? I have done some online searches and have not found any. If there is, where can I find it?

    As always, thank you for all the work you do for this blog. Much appreciated!

    Best wishes for the holiday’s.


    • Please accept my apology for such a delayed response – just dealing with so many competing priorities. As for a recording of Mrs. Harding’s voice. Very interesting. I once heard a few seconds of a recording of a woman identified as Mrs. Harding in which she describes her husband pressing a ceremonial button to – if I remember this right – send an experimental little rocket or something like that a feet few into the air from a large lawn. I have never been able to track it down however. If it was her, I do remember the woman speaking about her husband in the past tense, so it would suggest it was recorded in 1924, entirely feasible. Thanks for writing David – and for your thoughtful remarks.

      • Dear Mr. Anthony,
        It is I who you the thanks – you have had a rough month with everything crashing – I was so surprised to see you respond! I am looking forward to reading your newest work on Mrs. McKinley – when will it be available to us?

        Are you going to the White House again this holiday season? I am available if you need a date! 🙂

        In admiration and appreciation for all your hard work.


  5. Fascinating. I don’t know if I find it distressing or funny that the press didn’t see the irony of maligning someone because of their ethnicity, coating it as patriotism, when the US was engaged in a war with a country that (at the time) encouraged exactly this deplorable way of thinking.

    • I’m not versed enough in German history to know if the sort of attitudes which led to the Holocaust during World War II were already prevalent in World War I, but there is bitter irony in the fact you correctly point out. Scapegoating doesn’t seem to be the prerogative of any form of government, does it? I greatly appreciate your taking the time to write. Cheers.


  1. Pat Nixon: First-Generation German-American & Her Lincoln Assassination Link « Carl Anthony Online: Presidential Pop Culture, Mythic Americana, Holidays, Legends, Pie & Dogs
  2. The First President To Win With Actors: Al Jolson’s 1920 Campaign Song for Harding « Carl Anthony Online: Presidential Pop Culture, Mythic Americana, Holidays, Legends, Pie & Dogs
  3. The First President To Win With Actors: Al Jolson’s 1920 Campaign Song for Harding « Carl Anthony Online
%d bloggers like this: